Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council adopts amendment clarifying developer responsibility for decorative street-light costs

August 12, 2025 | Mount Holly City, Gaston County, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council adopts amendment clarifying developer responsibility for decorative street-light costs
Mount Holly City Council on Aug. 11 adopted an amendment to sections of the subdivision and land development ordinance (case TA258) to clarify street-lighting requirements and who pays installation costs.

Planning staff described the change as a housekeeping update to reflect long-standing practice: developers must bury utility lines in new subdivisions, install decorative street lights where required, and pay construction and abnormal or decorative "adder" fees before the city will assume the lighting contract. The city will pay the electricity bill only after accepting lighting for maintenance. Staff said the ordinance update makes explicit that any relocations or modifications after installation are at the expense of the developer or homeowners association, not the city.

"This is something that's been the standard practice for the city for the last 30 years where decorative street lights are to be funded by the developer. The city will only pay the power bill once it's accepted for maintenance," planning staff Mr. Beal said. Staff cited prior ice-storms and the city's earlier allowance of wooden poles with overhead power in older subdivisions as background for the clarification.

Councilmember Hough moved to approve the ordinance change; Councilmember Craig seconded. The motion passed.

Staff said the update includes redline clarifications recommended by multiple departments and aims to prevent attempts by developers to shift decorative lighting costs onto HOAs or the city. No subsidies for developers were authorized by the ordinance change, according to staff comments.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI