Council accepts petition and directs staff to pursue steps for Davis annexation initial meeting

5899565 · September 11, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council directed staff to accept a 10% petition for the Davis property annexation and to begin pre-annexation tasks including pre-annexation zoning, departmental preapplication meetings, a development agreement and coordination with Snohomish County for an interlocal agreement.

Monroe City Council on Tuesday directed staff to prepare a resolution accepting a 10% annexation petition filed by the Davis family and to begin the procedural steps toward a 60% petition and annexation. The actions were unanimous.

David Toyer of Toyer Strategic Advisors, representing the Davis property owners, described the filing as a standard 60% petition process that begins with a 10% notice and initial meeting. Toyer said the Davis property has been part of Monroe’s comprehensive-plan discussions and that the applicant expects to use a development agreement and a site-specific interlocal with Snohomish County, similar to the city’s recent Monroe 30 annexation.

Council approved multiple staff directions in sequence: accept and record the 10% annexation petition; commence pre-annexation zoning review; schedule a pre-application meeting with affected city departments and Snohomish County Regional Fire & Rescue to discuss utilities, transportation and site layout; prepare and submit a pre-annexation development agreement; and coordinate with Snohomish County on a site-specific interlocal agreement covering transfer/maintenance of utilities and infrastructure. Each motion passed 7-0.

Staff advised that the petition will proceed through signature circulation (the 60% petition), development-agreement negotiations and interlocal agreement steps. The city noted it currently has no master interlocal agreement with Snohomish County for annexations and that a site-specific interlocal will be required to prevent the county from invoking boundary-review jurisdiction.

Next steps: staff will draft the resolution accepting the 10% petition, begin pre-annexation zoning review, coordinate the pre-application meeting and start development-agreement preparation with the applicants.