Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Mini Storage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Enterprise board denies plan amendment and zone change for proposed Arville mini‑storage; vacate easement approved
Summary
The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended denial of a plan amendment and zone change for a proposed three‑story mini‑storage facility on Arville Street, citing scale and residential impacts; a separate easement vacate tied to the project was approved.
The Enterprise Town Advisory Board on April 30 recommended denial of a plan amendment and a zone change tied to a proposed three‑story mini‑storage facility on Arville Street and denied the project's use permit, while approving an unrelated easement vacation connected to the site.
The applicant, represented by Marissa Furman, told the board the proposal would convert roughly 1.25 acres from compact neighborhood to neighborhood commercial, rezone it from RS‑20 (single‑family) to CG (commercial general) and build a three‑story self‑storage building with about 365 units and a small office. Furman said the building would be “less intense” than other commercial uses and called it “a net positive infill development for the area.”
Neighbors and board members raised concerns about building height, proximity to a nearby motor‑coach resort and the adequacy of screening. Board members questioned the 40‑foot height and the potential noise and visual impacts on adjacent resort residents and single‑family homes. One board member said the proposed architecture and height were insufficiently mitigative compared with other storage projects the member had seen.
Public‑safety and technical site issues also factored into discussion: the applicant proposed a one‑way in/one‑way out driveway (32 feet where 36 is standard), reduced parking (10 spaces compared with a typical 20), and 8‑foot block walls on several property lines. Planning staff and Public Works supported the reduced driveway width given the internal circulation design; Public Works raised no objection to that particular waiver.
After deliberation the board voted to recommend denial of the plan amendment (PA25700019) and the zone change (ZC250231), and the application for the use permit for the mini‑storage facility (UC250232) was likewise denied. The vacate and abandon easements application (VS250234) related to the site was approved per staff conditions.
The board’s motions were recorded as recommendations to the County; the transcript records the motions and final recommendations but does not list individual councilmember vote tallies by name.
The applicant may pursue the matter with the Clark County decision bodies to which planning and zoning items are forwarded for final action.
