Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

West Seneca board open to recognizing large donations; policy committee to study legal limits and return with proposal

September 11, 2025 | WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, School Districts, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

West Seneca board open to recognizing large donations; policy committee to study legal limits and return with proposal
Board members discussed whether and how to recognize sizable donations to district schools and facilities on Sept. 9, and asked district administration to return with a policy framework informed by state guidance.

Superintendent Dr. Krueger asked the board whether the district should entertain recognition (plaques, signage or naming) for donations he framed as “substantial and sizable” — he used $100,000 or greater as an example for the conversation. Board members responded positively in principle but asked the administration and the policy committee to review relevant state guidance and audit concerns before formalizing a policy.

Why it matters: public recognition and naming for donor gifts can influence fundraising and community partnerships, but school districts must follow state rules on sponsorships, advertising and facility naming. Board members noted past local examples of donor recognition (playground donor bricks, booster‑donated scoreboards) and said clear, consistent criteria should guide future recognition.

Key points from discussion:
- Threshold and form: The superintendent suggested $100,000 as a starting frame; board members discussed plaques, signage and website acknowledgments as possible recognition forms.
- Legal and ethical limits: Board members asked administration to check New York State Department of Education and state comptroller guidance (citing past statewide rules limiting advertising/exclusivity such as pouring rights agreements) and to ensure audit compliance.
- Process: The board asked administration to involve the policy committee in drafting recommended parameters (when recognition is allowed, what forms, and how requests are accepted) and to return with a proposal.

Outcome: The board provided informal support to pursue a policy and directed staff to research legal parameters and report back. No final naming or recognition decisions were made at the meeting.

Ending: District staff said they will investigate model policies used by other districts and return to the policy committee with recommended language for board consideration.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI