Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ems topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners review EMS subsidy and propose maintaining higher local EMS tax rates to reduce general-fund support

5867094 · May 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff recommended keeping EMS district tax rates at 5 cents per $100 of assessed value in several districts to reduce the general-fund subsidy for emergency medical services; staff presented audited EMS expenses of about $3.9 million and discussed projected revenue increases from patient billing.

County staff presented audited 2023-24 EMS revenues and expenses and recommended maintaining or restoring a 5-cent-per-$100 property-tax rate in most EMS districts to reduce the county general-fund subsidy.

On the revenue side, staff reported 2023-24 EMS departmental expenses at about $3.922 million and patient billing receipts near $900,000. Using the budget recommended for the coming year, staff said patient-billing receipts are expected to rise to about $1.3 million, in part because of higher reimbursement rates and more trip volume. Even with increased patient billing and higher EMS district tax rates, EMS will still require a general-fund subsidy but at a reduced level.

County staff walked commissioners through the revenue-neutral calculations for each EMS district. For example, Washington Township EMS's revenue-neutral rate was shown at 3.3 cents per $100 valuation, which would generate roughly $247,000; staff recommended keeping the rate at 5 cents, which would generate about $374,584 (an additional $127,358 for that district). Similar recommendations were shown for Bath Township and other districts.

Staff said the recommended district-rate increases would reduce, but not eliminate, the general-fund subsidy for EMS; they also noted that some overhead (dispatch at 911 and management time) is not allocated in the EMS department's expense sheet.

Commissioners and fire/EMS leaders discussed daytime response capabilities and how higher district rates could help fund staffing and operations. No formal tax-rate change was adopted at the workshop; the presentation was part of the budget planning process.