Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pension Contribution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff seek to extend 401(k) match for non‑LEO employees up to 5% — commissioners warned of budget impact
Summary
County staff proposed matching non‑law‑enforcement employee 401(k) contributions on a 1:1 basis up to 5%, which would increase recurring costs by roughly $500,000 to the general fund in the department’s estimate and smaller amounts for enterprise funds.
Get email alerts on the Pension Contribution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff presented an expansion request to raise the employer 401(k) match for non‑law‑enforcement (non‑LEO) employees to a 1:1 match up to 5%, aligning the county’s employer contribution more closely with the statutory 5% requirement for law enforcement officers.
The county manager explained that state law requires the county to contribute 5% for law enforcement officers, and that current county policy provides a matching structure for non‑LEO employees (many receive a 2% match). The proposal would allow non‑LEO employees to receive a 1:1 employer match up to 5% instead of the current lower matches.
Staff estimated the impact would be “a little over half a million dollars” to the general fund, about $43,000 to the water fund and $1,300 to the solid waste fund if every eligible employee participated. The manager noted the estimate assumed full participation and flagged that it would be a recurring cost.
No statutory authority beyond the state requirement for law‑enforcement contributions was cited; commissioners asked no immediate follow‑up questions and the item was entered for budget consideration rather than a formal vote.
If commissioners choose to fund the change, staff recommended using recurring revenue for recurring costs and one‑time funds for one‑time items elsewhere in the expansion book.

