Trustees pause immediate incentive vote; agree to form ad hoc committee on employee compensation

5864787 ยท August 22, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposal to pay a limited retention incentive to academic trainers drew divided opinion. Trustees did not adopt an incentive; instead they agreed to form an ad hoc committee to craft a wider, equitable compensation proposal for multiple employee groups and to consider timing relative to the district's planned local funding measure.

Trustee Macias introduced an agenda item asking the board to consider a retention incentive for the district's academic trainers after multiple employees and trustees described perceived pay inequities following state teacher pay adjustments. Macias proposed a narrowly scoped incentive for academic trainers and suggested a figure that administration later summarized as "up to $16.50" per trainer for the August-December period; Macias said that amount multiplied by 43 trainers would total $70,950. Trustees debated whether to approve a targeted incentive now or to include a broader set of employee groups (counselors, librarians, nurses, assistant principals) in a larger plan tied to projected local funding. Several trustees voiced concern that approving a single-group incentive would create divisiveness, and others said the district's current deficit made any additional, open-ended compensation risky. Trustee Macias said the proposal was intended as a temporary retention measure while the board pursues longer-term remedies; several trustees asked that any remedy be contingent on the passage of the district's upcoming local funding measure (referred to in discussion as the "VADER"). Rather than take a binding vote on a payment, the board agreed to assemble an ad hoc committee to develop a comprehensive compensation proposal that would consider multiple employee categories and funding contingencies. Trustees who volunteered to serve said they would bring a proposal back to the full board in September. The board did not adopt the suggested incentive amount during the meeting.