Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District advances solar power agreements; roof-overlay timing could delay projects
Summary
Superintendent Dr. Willett told the board the district is advancing negotiations with two solar developers and that attorneys are reviewing power purchase agreements and memoranda of understanding. A Sept. 15 submission deadline and questions about doing an overlay roof rather than a full replacement could delay portions of the project.
The Tallinn Board of Education heard an update on the district’s proposed solar projects, with Superintendent Dr. Willett saying the district is pursuing contracts with TitanGen/GreenSky and ACEs Up and that town and legal review is underway.
Dr. Willett said attorneys are reviewing “the PPAs, the power purchase agreements and MOUs,” and that the projects will be on the town council agenda on Sept. 9. “September 15 is our deadline to submit ... into the supply program,” Dr. Willett said, warning that timing could create “a potential obstacle to hitting that deadline.”
Why it matters: the board is weighing whether to proceed now on arrays that can move forward within the current timetable and to delay the high-school roof option that may require a full roof replacement rather than an overlay. Board members and staff said an overlay would not be reimbursed by the state and could slow the project if unresolved.
Board discussion and specifics: Dr. Willett listed the two developer groupings under consideration — TitanGen with GreenSky, and ACEs Up — and described how the vendors would divide work: TitanGen/GreenSky would handle an array and a cantilever at the high school, while ACEs Up would focus on other school buildings. Dr. Willett said the district is using multiple legal reviewers because of conflicts: Robinson & Kohl is reviewing ACEs Up documents and Chiplin is reviewing TitanGen/GreenSky documents because one local firm could not represent both sides.
Facilities staff member Peter Stav, referenced in the discussion, is reviewing whether roofs should be replaced or overlaid. Board members stressed a concern that choosing an overlay could prevent the district from receiving state reimbursement tied to a full roof replacement. “You don't get reimbursed for an overlay project,” Dr. Willett said; he also said stakeholders estimated overlay costs could be higher on a per-effective-life basis (discussion noted “1.3 or 1.5” as rough comparative factors mentioned in the meeting).
Members also discussed possible timing synergies, such as combining installation of a cantilever array at the high school with planned repaving of the adjacent parking area, but agreed that complex bidding or roof questions could slow the process. Dr. Willett said splitting projects into separate agreements — for example, doing current-ready portions now and the high-school roof later — would be feasible but could result in separate PPAs and differing terms later.
Next steps and risks: staff will send materials to the town for the Sept. 9 council meeting and continue legal review. The board was told that if the overlay-versus-replacement question cannot be resolved before the submission deadline, some portions of the work could be delayed or have to be pursued in a later funding cycle. Dr. Willett also told the board that federal support for solar programs is being scaled back and that delay could jeopardize the most favorable near-term terms.
The update was informational; no formal board vote was taken on contracting or project scope at the meeting.
