Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Resident questions selection of engineering firms for sewer-separation project; legal and staff responses

July 14, 2025 | Hackensack City, Bergen County, New Jersey


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Resident questions selection of engineering firms for sewer-separation project; legal and staff responses
During public comment, a resident raised concerns about the city’s choice of engineering consultants for a sewer-separation project, asking why Suburban Engineers — which she described as having strong state ties for securing grant funding — had not been rehired and why Boswell Engineering was selected.

Resident comments: The speaker said she had a longstanding relationship with a Suburban Engineers employee involved with the project and asserted Suburban Engineers were experts in sewer separation and well-connected to state funding sources. She asked council to explain why Boswell was retained instead.

City and legal response: City Attorney Richard Malagiri replied that Boswell Engineering, Alaimo Engineering and Remington & Vernick (corrected name) are "full service" firms licensed by the State of New Jersey and capable of performing assigned engineering work. A council member said the selection process had been thoughtfully conducted and that the firms had been selected based on proposals; the council also acknowledged that decisions about consultant contracts occurred in prior administrations and that records would reflect the contracting authority exercised by council at those times.

Why it matters: Consultant selection can affect project design, grant access and construction schedules for capital projects such as combined sewer separation. Residents asked for clarity about the decision-making process and the potential to seek grant funding to reduce taxpayer burden.

Discussion versus decision: The exchange was public comment and staff response; no policy or contract action was taken during the meeting. Council and legal staff noted the firms’ licensure and said the selection was made following a review of proposals in prior years.

What’s next: Staff and council recorded the concern for the record; residents were invited to follow up with the city manager for specific location-level concerns and to request documentation about consultant selection and contracts.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Jersey articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI