Developers present Chipotle site plan; staff discuss Lot B, private road and parking

5861551 · June 26, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Clifton planning meeting, staff outlined a subdivision and site plan that would place a 2,325-square-foot Chipotle on Lot B, keep a private road running in front of the building and reduce Lot B’s recorded size to under 1 acre. No formal action was taken.

At a planning meeting in Clifton on Oct. 11, 2025, staff described a subdivision and site-plan application that would locate a 2,325-square-foot Chipotle on Lot B, keep a private road running in front of the building and reduce Lot B’s recorded lot line to under 1 acre.

An unnamed staff member said the private road would “continue through … in front of the Chipotle,” and cautioned that the exact lot lines are largely a paper adjustment: “as we noted at the previous application … the exact lot lines for something like Lot B … it's not going to change how the lot will function.” The staff member added that the applicant needs the lot configuration for financing and deed-restriction purposes: “we do need … for the applicant in terms of financing and in terms of deed restrictions to have it as, part of 1 of the common lots.”

The same staff member described the Chipotle building as “about 2,325 square feet” and said the plan shows “it's got 37 park,” a phrase that appeared truncated in the transcript. The staff presentation also noted that a second part of the application concerns the southern portion of the development (referenced on plan sheet S-4). A question from the discussion asked whether the private road would be two-way and whether the width would be 30 feet.

No vote or formal decision was recorded in the provided transcript excerpt; the item remained at the discussion stage in the portion of the meeting provided. The transcript did not specify next steps, any required approvals, or a timetable for further review.