At a municipal meeting, a motion was placed on the floor to approve a resolution for PB Nutcliffe Masters, LLC seeking preliminary and final major site plan approvals, a minor subdivision and related variances for property at 340 Kingsland Avenue. Commissioner Venaso moved the motion and Commissioner Korbanics seconded. “I’ll move, madam chair,” said Commissioner Venaso; Korbanics replied, “Seconded.”

The parcel was identified in the motion as Block 80.02, Lots 1.01, 10.0610.0710.08 and 1.10. The roll-call vote began during the meeting; Commissioner Benaso recorded “Yes,” and Commissioner Corbanix recorded “Yes.” The transcript does not record additional roll-call votes or a final tally, and the final outcome of the motion is not included in the provided record.

The meeting opened with confirmation that notice requirements under the Open Public Meeting Act were satisfied and that a quorum was present. A speaker who identified themself as a staff member told the chair that minutes were not prepared and would be available at the next meeting. No substantive debate, public comment, or staff presentation on the merits of the site plan, the subdivision, or the requested variances is recorded in the provided transcript excerpt.

Because the transcript stops after partial roll-call entries, the record does not show whether any conditions, amendments, or specific variance findings were adopted or whether subsequent agency or permitting steps are required. The motion and the partial roll call are the only formal actions recorded in the excerpt.