Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hager Environmental Testing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board authorizes environmental testing at Hager site and directs further security measures
Summary
Trustees authorized up to $127,200 for environmental testing at the Hager building, and during discussion directed staff to pursue fencing, screening and motion‑activated cameras to address repeat trespass and fires at the vacant structure.
The Village Board approved a resolution on July 21 authorizing the village administrator to contract with EPS Environmental Services for environmental testing at the Hager building, with a not‑to‑exceed amount of $127,200. After the vote, trustees discussed security measures for the property and generally directed staff to pursue fencing, screening and cameras to reduce trespass and hazardous activity.
Why it matters: staff said prior Phase‑1 and limited Phase‑2 work identified potential soil and water contamination under the building. The authorized Phase‑2 testing will define the extent of contamination and inform cost estimates and options for demolition, remediation and any future redevelopment.
Environmental testing: staff said results are expected in about three months and that the testing will better quantify the extent of soil and groundwater contamination and cost implications for demolition and remediation.
Security discussion: staff and the police chief described repeated break‑ins, fires and vandalism at the Hager site and said prior barriers and razor wire have been cut or bypassed. Trustees discussed options including chain‑link fencing, screened fencing (black wind‑screen slats), motion‑activated lights, trail cameras, and whether to rent or purchase a fence. Board members expressed concerns about cost, durability and the ability of fences to deter determined trespassers, but the general consensus was to pursue perimeter fencing with screening plus cameras and motion lighting and to gather additional quotes.
Votes and next steps: the environmental testing contract passed by roll call with all present trustees voting yes. For site security, trustees asked staff to obtain additional quotes for fencing (rental and purchase options), screening materials and motion‑activated cameras and return with specific cost estimates and recommended procurement steps.
Context: staff said the village has repeatedly attempted to secure the property, deployed razor wire and filled window wells, but incidents continue. Board members cited liability and neighborhood safety concerns in supporting further security measures and continuing environmental assessment.
