Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Safety Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Farmington repeals optional Chapter 13‑O‑6 of Minnesota building code; sprinkler thresholds will follow state model code
Summary
The council voted to repeal Chapter 13‑O‑6 (special fire protection systems) from the city code, returning sprinkler thresholds to the Minnesota model building code; staff said the change provides design flexibility while retaining sprinkler requirements where the model code mandates them.
Get email alerts on the Building Safety Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On July 21 the Farmington City Council approved Ordinance 2025‑TAG‑005 to repeal Chapter 13‑O‑6 — the optional local adoption of special fire protection (automatic sprinkler) provisions — from the city code. City staff said the repeal will not eliminate sprinkler requirements where the Minnesota State Building Code requires them; instead, it will make the city follow the model code thresholds. "The requirements for fire sprinklers do not go away which is a key takeaway tonight," presenter Josh told the council, explaining that repeal returns threshold decisions to the statewide model and grants more flexibility to architects and developers. Staff recommended repeal to give design professionals flexibility when designing new buildings, additions, remodels and occupancy classification changes. Staff noted that the city has added operational safety measures — including an expanding fire department staffing plan, comprehensive plan reviews that include the building official and fire chief, a new certificate of occupancy permit to be issued for all occupancy changes, and continued annual fire inspections — which together provide checks on life‑safety and property preservation even after repeal. Council members said the change followed robust work‑session discussion and noted several developers had already revisited designs in anticipation of the new, more flexible approach. Staff confirmed the repeal will be forward‑starting and that there were no active projects currently in review that would be affected retroactively. Two prospective businesses had consulted staff and said they would revise designs and reapply under the new approach. After discussion, the council voted in favor of the ordinance by roll call. Staff said the change aims to promote economic development while maintaining safeguards through inspections and plan review.

