Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Mobile Home Rents topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stanton residents press council on steep mobile‑home space‑rent hikes; council opts for resource briefings rather than town hall
Summary
Dozens of Stanton mobile‑home residents described rising space‑rent increases and requested city action. Council debated a town‑hall request but voted unanimously to direct staff to invite outside resource agencies to brief council and make resident support information available.
Dozens of Stanton residents, many identifying themselves as long‑time or fixed‑income residents of local mobile‑home parks, urged the City Council on June 10 to act after several parks announced steep space‑rent increases since 2021.
Speakers at the council meeting described repeated, cumulative rent hikes and said the increases are forcing families and seniors toward economic hardship. Residents from Fernwood Mobile Home Park, Plaza Pines and other parks described multi‑hundred‑dollar and cumulative increases that, several said, raised monthly space rents by roughly $1,000 or more since 2021.
“We need help,” said Steven R. Berger, who described a more than 100% increase in his park’s space rent over four years and asked city officials to consider rent stabilization. “It’s not fair. It’s stealing equity,” he said.
Several renters said they are seniors on fixed incomes or single caregivers and described tradeoffs between food and rent. “I am on a fixed income,” Martha Zuniga said during the sewer‑rates hearing earlier in the night; other mobile‑park speakers later emphasized the same concern for housing stability.
Council members discussed options, legal constraints and the practical challenges of locally enforcing rent control. Mayor Schauber and several council members noted prior experience and legal complexity; staff and council discussed that previous attempts at local rent‑control approaches had proved difficult to administer. Council members also said state law and the fiscal implications of enforcement complicate a local rent‑control program.
After debate, Council member Warren moved and Mayor Schauber seconded a motion — with a friendly amendment — that staff not proceed with a city‑led town hall at this time but instead to invite identified outside organizations and resource providers to present to council and to assemble information for residents about rental‑assistance and other programs. The motion passed unanimously.
Council members and staff told residents that some existing assistance programs and nonprofit resources may be available; several council members offered to share contact information and direct residents to staff. Mayor Schauber said he would make contact cards available so residents could get individualized help.
The decision leaves in place the council’s option to revisit broader policy action later; the council did not adopt any rent‑control ordinance or binding change to park owners’ authority on rates at the June 10 meeting. Residents who spoke urged further action, including a city‑convened forum, legal review and exploration of direct assistance for deeply affected households.
