Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council adopts zoning text amendment to speed some temporary permits, limit off‑site sign displays

5854767 · August 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved Ordinance 2025186 to create an administrative (Class 1) temporary use permit for short‑term, low‑impact uses and to set standards for temporary off‑site sign displays.

The Sahuarita Town Council voted Aug. 20 to adopt Ordinance 2025186, amending Town Code Title 18 (sections 18.07 and 18.93) to create an administrative review for certain temporary uses and to set new maximums for temporary off‑site signs. The ordinance was approved after a staff presentation and no public testimony at the hearing.

Planning staff member Dylan (last name not specified) told the council the change creates a Class 1 temporary use permit — an administrative review intended for short‑term, low‑impact activities such as temporary security trailers on active construction sites, temporary model home complexes, holiday sales and farmers markets, and temporary cargo container storage for commercial remodels. Longer or higher‑impact temporary uses remain subject to the current public‑hearing Class 2 process before the Board of Adjustment.

The amendment also defines standards for temporary off‑site sign plans that qualify for administrative review: a total of 60 days in any 365‑day period, up to three display periods within those 60 days, a maximum of 120 square feet of signage total, a 12‑square‑foot cap per sign and no more than 20 signs per campaign. Applications that do not meet these standards will still require a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission.

Dylan said the changes respond to applicants whose timing requirements were incompatible with the longer public‑hearing schedule and were recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The council adopted the ordinance by voice vote.