Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the E Scooters Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glencoe staff to study local rules for low‑speed e‑scooters after state law change
Summary
Village staff updated trustees on a recent state statute affecting e‑scooter and e‑bike use, described outreach with schools and neighboring municipalities, and recommended preparing a draft local ordinance for the board to consider.
GLENCOE, Ill. — Village staff told the board on June 18 that a state statutory change and rising local complaints about low‑speed electric scooters and e‑bikes have prompted outreach and consideration of a local ordinance.
The issue matters because village staff and police say scooter and e‑bike use near schools and on sidewalks has raised safety concerns involving children and young riders.
Andy (staff presenter) briefed the board on recent state and regional activity and on local outreach with District 35. He said, verbatim, “it essentially, by statute dictates the operators of the ensueers must must be 18 years or older,” and described efforts to educate parents and students. Staff reported partnering with schools on information campaigns and noted neighboring municipalities are already adopting or considering local restrictions: Deerfield enacted a local ordinance, Lake Forest enacted a compromise measure and Northbrook is considering rules in July.
Staff described Deerfield’s ordinance as tying enforcement to parental notification and educational follow‑up rather than immediate punitive fines for children, and said Lake Forest reduced the age threshold in its local compromise in some categories. Staff recommended researching nearby municipal models and returning to the board with a draft local ordinance for consideration next month.
Board members asked for details on the statute and on how enforcement and parental‑notification models worked in neighboring communities. Staff said they would prepare a draft ordinance, technical language and implementation options for a future meeting.
No ordinance or vote was adopted at the meeting; the board asked staff to continue research and return with draft language.
