Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board reviews updated bullying and cyberbullying policy with new definitions, action plans and grievance path

August 15, 2025 | Murray School District, Utah School Boards, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board reviews updated bullying and cyberbullying policy with new definitions, action plans and grievance path
District staff presented an updated bullying policy that tightens definitions, adds cyberbullying language tied to off-campus communications and requires written action plans and reporting. The revisions follow state model language and administrative guidance presented to the board.

Director Dean and district administrators explained the changes the state has recommended, including a clearer definition that distinguishes bullying from teasing or ordinary conflict. The policy now includes staff bullying language, defining conduct that “a reasonable person would find hostile” and that “substantially interferes” with educational performance. The cyberbullying section was expanded to include “communication generated off campus that causes or threatens to cause a material and substantial disruption,” consistent with case law and past practice.

Administrators explained the new requirement for two action plans after an incident: one for the student who was the subject of the incident and one for the alleged perpetrator. Each plan must address safety, supportive measures and follow-up communication with parents. Director Dean noted principals have informally used action plans but the policy formalizes the requirement.

The updated policy also includes a grievance path for employees: an employee alleging abusive conduct by a student or parent may file a written grievance identifying the individual and proposed resolution; the principal must investigate and determine appropriate relief. Staff discussed the limits of district authority over parents (who are not under student disciplinary jurisdiction) but stressed available tools such as restricted communication plans or trespass notices.

Board members asked about timelines for parent notification and expressed interest in more precise language (for example, “as soon as reasonably possible” instead of “promptly”). Administrators said they will produce a clean, non-redlined version of the policy and training guidance for principals. The item was presented for review and no adoption vote was taken.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI