Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council denies appeal of tree-removal permit request after applicant failed to provide location map

June 19, 2025 | Hibbing City, St. Louis County, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council denies appeal of tree-removal permit request after applicant failed to provide location map
The Hibbing City Council on Wednesday denied an administrative appeal by Dennis Richards challenging the city's refusal to issue a permit to remove trees and brush in what the city described as a vacated alley right-of-way near 30 Third Street West.

City public-works staff told the council Richards submitted a permit request by email but did not provide a map showing the exact location of the proposed cutting. "He did not provide said map, so I denied the request," Public Works staffer Mister Storey told the council. Storey said the city needs a location map so staff can determine whether the proposed clearing would fall inside the public right-of-way, where the city routinely clears vegetation that interferes with utilities or access.

The council asked for a motion either to grant the appeal and overturn Storey's denial or to deny the appeal and affirm the staff decision. Councilor Swiberger moved to deny the appeal; Councilor Bayless seconded. After brief discussion about whether Richards could later provide the requested map, Storey said that if the map shows work within the right-of-way the city would perform the clearing or authorize it for utility purposes.

The motion to deny the appeal carried. Storey and other staff confirmed the applicant retains the option to resubmit the permit with a map; approval would depend on the map showing work within the city's right-of-way or for utilities, in which case the city would address the clearing.

No formal fines or further penalties were discussed at the meeting; the action on the appeal was a staff-decision affirmation, not an enforcement action.

The denial was recorded as the council's formal disposition of the administrative appeal.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI