Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tree Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delafield council discusses draft tree ordinance targeting large clearings, asks staff to draft language tied to permits
Summary
Alderman Price and other council members requested staff draft an ordinance that would require site-plan review and mitigation when significant tree removal occurs during new construction, teardowns, or large additions; no ordinance was adopted at the June 16 meeting.
Delafield — The Common Council on June 16 discussed a proposal to draft a tree-protection ordinance aimed at limiting large-scale clearings of mature trees associated with teardown/rebuilds and major additions, and asked city staff to prepare draft language tied to existing permitting processes.
Alderman Price reviewed a community resolution passed about two years earlier and summarized research on neighboring municipalities. He said the council’s intent was to target major development-driven removals rather than routine residential maintenance. He recommended the city require site plans when homeowners propose removing multiple specimen trees during a teardown, rebuild or significant addition, and said permit fees could offset staff review costs.
Why it matters: Councilors argued the measure would protect mature hardwoods that contribute to lake health, neighborhood character and property values while avoiding onerous regulation for routine tree maintenance.
Key points from discussion
Price reported outreach to planners in Oconomowoc, Pewaukee, Summit and Mequon; Mequon’s ordinance was described as more comprehensive and supported by a full-time arborist. Price and staff suggested a narrower Delafield approach tied to the permitting process so that only larger projects would trigger review.
Staff and council members discussed several design choices: a threshold of removing more than three to five specimen trees to trigger review; tying review to building permits for teardowns, new lots and major additions; mitigation options such as requiring replacement plantings or a per-inch mitigation fee to be paid into a city tree fund, and a modest permit fee to cover staff costs (estimated under $500 to $750 for typical residential projects). Several council members noted a desire not to unduly restrict routine maintenance.
No formal ordinance was adopted; council members asked staff to draft a targeted ordinance for future consideration and to return with recommended thresholds and fee structures.
