Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates credits, refunds for short-term rental licensing fee reduction, tables decision
Summary
Richland County committee discussed whether property owners who previously paid higher conditional-use fees should receive credits or refunds after the county proposed lowering short-term rental fees; members raised concerns about precedent and administrative burden and tabled the issue for further review with county counsel.
Committee members debated whether property owners who previously paid the $500 conditional-use fee for short-term rentals should receive a credit or refund after staff proposed reducing the fee to $25 (or a reduced rate) going forward.
Staff explained the change was intended to make coming into compliance easier for operators; committee members raised fairness and precedent concerns for owners who paid the earlier higher fee. One committee member argued against issuing credits: “I'm against giving credit. Sorry. I'm against giving them credit.” Another said tracking long-term credits could be administratively difficult and create precedent that may complicate future fee or grant changes.
Suggestions included issuing a limited credit for recent applicants (e.g., a multi-year credit or a partial refund) or meeting with county attorney Wendell to assess legal and administrative feasibility. Staff recommended tabling the decision until consultation with counsel and follow-up next month. The committee agreed to table the matter and directed staff to consult counsel and return with a proposal that balances fairness and administrative practicality.
No formal refunds or credits were authorized at the meeting; staff will consult with counsel and present options for committee consideration next month.
