Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Panel debates entrapment-by-estoppel claim after officer told defendant to 'follow me'
Summary
In Commonwealth v. Edward Cefalo, defense counsel urged the Appeals Court to allow an entrapment-by-estoppel defense after an officer told the defendant to “follow me,” arguing a jury could reasonably find he relied on the officer’s instruction and lacked intent to violate a restraining order.
Commonwealth v. Edward Cefalo: On appeal, defense counsel asked the Massachusetts Appeals Court to consider an entrapment-by-estoppel defense after an encounter in which Officer Thong allegedly told defendant Edward Cefalo to “follow me” to a residence. The defense argued a jury could find Cefalo reasonably relied on the officer’s direction and therefore lacked the culpable intent to violate a restraining order; the Commonwealth said the remark was too vague, the record lacked proof that Thong knew about the restraining order, and the defense did not carry the evidentiary burden to obtain the instruction.
Why it matters: The court grappled with how to apply entrapment-by-estoppel principles in state law, contrasting Commonwealth v. Twitchell and federal tests (First Circuit and Ninth…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

