Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Dental assisting council backs higher review fees, cuts infection-control grace period to 30 days
Summary
The Dental Assisting Council recommended that the Dental Board of California ask the Legislature to amend AB 873 to set higher review fees for three new dental‑assistant courses and to require unlicensed dental assistants to complete the board’s infection‑control course within 30 days of first exposure.
The Dental Assisting Council recommended that the Dental Board of California ask the Legislature to amend AB 873 to set higher application-review fees for three newly authorized dental assistant courses and to require unlicensed dental assistants to complete the board’s infection‑control course within 30 days of first exposure to infectious material.
The council’s action also asked the board to set a $7,330 fee for review of interim therapeutic restoration (ITR), radiographic decision making (RDM) and radiation‑safety courses, and a $3,830 fee for review of the infection‑control course. Council members voted to retain current draft language in Business and Professions Code Section 17.55 that limits use of the fully electronic infection‑control course for unlicensed assistants (Subdivision G), while licensed RDA and RDAEF pathways would continue to require any clinical instruction specified by statute or regulation.
Why it matters: Board staff told the council that the $300 cap in the current AB 873 draft would not cover the full cost of thorough course reviews, site visits and staff time. The higher fees are intended to cover travel and staff workload for program evaluations and recurring…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

