Resident urges council to study a cultural center instead of another passive park at West End parcel

5842177 · August 29, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Local resident Steve Conroy urged the council to reconsider a proposed passive park on a vacant West End lot and to commission a feasibility study for a multipurpose cultural and economic destination such as a botanical garden, interactive museum or community workshop space.

Steve Conroy addressed the council during public comment on Aug. 28, urging the City Council to reconsider a proposal to develop a passive park on a vacant lot bordered by Fry Boulevard, Fabb Avenue and Veterans Drive in the West End.

Conroy said the West End already has adequate green space and argued the parcel would better serve the community and local economy as a destination facility that draws visitors. “By defaulting to another park, we're choosing a minimal community impact over transformational potential,” Conroy said, offering alternatives including a botanical garden with an education center, an interactive history and art museum, or a multipurpose workshop space for skills and small business development.

Conroy requested that the council commission a feasibility study for a community cultural center or survey residents about preferences for the property, and explore partnerships with local organizations. He framed the suggestion as a way to convert a maintenance liability into an economic asset that would generate foot traffic, support near‑by businesses and create programming and jobs.

Council response: No formal action was taken during the meeting on the West End parcel. The comment was received during the public‑comment portion of the agenda; councilmembers did not vote or direct staff to begin a feasibility study during the session.

Why this matters: Development choices for city‑owned parcels shape neighborhood amenities, operating costs and potential economic development. Conroy’s remarks requested that the council consider alternatives that emphasize destination programming and partnerships rather than passive open space.

Meeting action: Public comment only; no referral, motion or staff direction recorded in the meeting transcript.