Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technical Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Technical Advisory Committee urges regulatory clarity on bait stations, structure definitions and monitoring devices
Summary
The Structural Pest Control Board’s newly formed Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) recommended March 12 that the board review and update regulatory language to address confusion arising from bait stations and monitoring devices, and to clarify key terms such as “structure” and “infestation.”
The Structural Pest Control Board’s newly formed Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) recommended March 12 that the board review and update regulatory language to address confusion arising from bait stations and monitoring devices, and to clarify key terms such as “structure” and “infestation.”
Why it matters: Bait stations and monitoring products have been used for decades but have evolved. Industry members and department staff told the committee that state regulations and notices have not kept pace with scientific practice and product label language; that has created liability and enforcement uncertainty for licensees and regulators.
What the committee recommended: TAC members — a mix of industry, academic and regulator professionals — described four priority areas: (1) clarify definitions (e.g., structure, pre‑ vs. post‑construction, infestation inside vs. outside a structure); (2) align laws, pesticide labels and recommendations about monitoring stations and bait installation (including whether above‑ground baiting can satisfy control requirements); (3) address technical questions around deployment and end‑of‑treatment actions such as removal of subterranean termite tubes after management with above‑ground stations; and (4) prepare regulatory and guidance options for the board’s next meetings. Members noted other jurisdictions treat baits as an accepted alternative to liquid treatments and cited studies showing bait efficacy in certain circumstances.
Board response and next steps: The committee will prepare draft definitions and a prioritized list of regulatory recommendations for the board to consider at future meetings. Staff said the TAC will continue to meet, compare model regulatory language (including EPA definitions of “structure”) and return with draft regulatory or guidance options.
Ending: Board members thanked the committee and requested regular updates while staff and the TAC draft proposed clarifying language and implementation steps.
