The Richfield City Council on Aug. 26 approved the first reading of seven ordinance amendments intended to update MR2 and MR3 multifamily zoning districts to facilitate "missing middle" housing such as triplexes, quadplexes and small apartment buildings. The amendments aim to streamline approvals, align density with the 2040 comprehensive plan and adjust technical standards such as EV charging and exterior materials."These types of homes can provide affordable and diverse living options," Council Member Hayford O'Leary said during presentation of the item, summarizing staff and consultant work that began in August 2024. Planning staff and consultant TC2 briefed the council that the update does not rezone any properties; it changes development rules for parcels already zoned MR2 or MR3. The staff presentation noted two late edits: EV‑charging requirements will be tied to number of stalls rather than units, and the allowable percentage of metal panel exterior material was increased from 20% to 40%. Council discussion focused on whether staff should be authorized to approve some multifamily projects administratively (without a public hearing) if they meet code. Council Member Burke pressed for more public notice and an opportunity for neighbors to comment before staff make final administrative approvals; Burke said notices currently would be sent "after the decision is made by staff." Planning Director Palman explained the city's "pyramid of discretion," saying council sets the rules and that, for permitted uses that meet the code, staff cannot lawfully deny an application and that public hearings could be misleading if council later lacked discretion to deny the project. Council members were divided: several supported administrative review for buildings up to specified unit counts to streamline smaller infill projects, while Burke maintained residents should have an opportunity to comment before staff approve large proposals that could be visible to neighbors. Council Member Hayford O'Leary successfully moved an amendment to remove proposed changes to a code section (509.13) that would have relaxed the side‑yard restriction for placement of central air conditioning units; the amendment passed and the ordinance returned to the main motion. The council approved the first reading 4–1. The ordinance will return for further consideration at the next council meeting as a second reading.
