Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City approves airport protection interlocal agreement with Flagler County in 3–2 vote

August 20, 2025 | Palm Coast City, Flagler County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City approves airport protection interlocal agreement with Flagler County in 3–2 vote
Palm Coast city council voted 3–2 on Aug. 26 to approve an interlocal agreement with Flagler County implementing airport protection zoning regulations and overlay zones required by state statute.

The agreement ties the city to the county’s airport protection rules, including height restrictions and noise‑contour considerations around the nearby airport. Council members who opposed the ILA said they preferred creation of a joint advisory or decision board and expressed concern about doing the work retroactively after the statutory deadline. "I still am just because we can't make this retroactive," Vice Mayor Pontieri said during the discussion, urging a joint board rather than the ILA. Other council members supported approving the ILA to ensure the city complies with state requirements.

Why it matters: State law requires municipalities adjacent to certain airports to adopt compatible zoning or enter into interlocal agreements to address airport protection areas; the measures typically involve overlay zones that limit building heights and address noise contours. City staff noted that the county considered and advanced the ILA at its meeting and that the agreement must be in place to meet statutory obligations.

Council debate and vote: The discussion covered whether the ILA would protect residents from future airport expansions and whether the overlay could affect homeowners if airport contours change. "My biggest concern is just preventing any overreach in terms of going into someone's personal property because of the growth of the airport," one council member said, citing the potential consequences of future airport changes. The motion to approve carried 3 to 2 (Vice Mayor Pontieri voted no; another no vote recorded), and the resolution was adopted.

Ending: City staff said the ILA will be transmitted to relevant parties and that the city remains able to pursue interagency coordination; several council members asked staff and county partners to keep the council briefed on any future airport changes that could affect sound contours or required protections.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe