Board agrees to timeline-extension agreement for remanded land-use case USR-1743
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Commissioners approved a local government timeline-extension agreement allowing applicants for Special Review Permit USR-1743 to pursue severance while preserving previously held rights following court remand.
The Weld County Board of Commissioners on July 23 approved a local government land-use timeline extension agreement for Special Review Permit USR-1743, allowing the applicants to pursue severance while preserving rights from a prior approval that had been remanded back to the county.
Deputy County Attorney Curran McDougall presented the agreement and summarised the history: the permit for a batch plant was originally approved by a previous board in 2018, then challenged and remanded in a 2006 administrative proceeding and later appealed to higher courts. McDougall said the case had been litigated through the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court and had now returned to the county for further proceedings. The applicants—identified in the agreement as Factis Hill Ranch Company and Simon Contractors Inc.—asked for the timeline agreement so they could pursue severance without forfeiting rights preserved in the earlier land-use action.
Commissioner Scott James moved approval; Commissioner Bridal seconded. The board voted by voice and approved the resolution. County staff credited attorney Corinne for her work processing the returned case.
Why it matters: the action preserves procedural rights for long-running land-use litigation and allows applicants to pursue an alternative permit path while county proceedings resume.
What was not specified: the transcript does not include dates for future hearings or the detailed terms of the timeline-extension agreement beyond the high-level purpose.