Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Longmont public-safety leaders warn of strained patrol and fire staffing; present phased hiring plan and difficult cuts as fallback

September 05, 2025 | Longmont, Boulder County, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Longmont public-safety leaders warn of strained patrol and fire staffing; present phased hiring plan and difficult cuts as fallback
Longmont public-safety leaders told the City Council on Sept. 2 that patrol and fire staffing have not kept pace with population growth and rising call complexity, and they presented a multi-year plan to add sworn personnel alongside professional-support hires.

Public-safety staff said the number of sworn officers assigned to patrol is effectively unchanged since 2009 (about 64'65 officers), while priority calls for service increased by about 84% in the last four years. The department noted higher work demands including expanded discovery obligations, mandatory body-worn camera recording, greater mental-health and homelessness response, and more technologically complex investigations.

James (JV) Brown, presenting the department's staffing analysis, proposed raising Longmont's sworn police staffing to about 2 officers per 1,000 residents by 2030. The plan would add roughly 40 police positions (plus supervisory ranks) and proposes a phased approach that includes a subset of transitional hires to reduce recruitment lag caused by annual turnover (department turnover runs about 10% for sworn ranks). Brown said the phased plan would require adding supervisory roles and professional positions'for records, property and evidence, and analytics'to reduce officers' non-patrol workload.

On the fire side, staff proposed a goal of about 1.25 firefighters per 1,000 residents, requiring roughly 27 additional positions phased over several years. The department said expanding fire staffing would also enable consideration of a city ambulance service, which would carry separate revenue and cost implications.

Contingency options: officials said that if the city cannot add positions, the department would face hard choices, including eliminating or reducing some programs (case management, collaborative services, a grant coordinator, parts of the restorative-justice collaboration, reductions to canine or SWAT capacity, or contracting changes such as the humane-society animal-control contract). Brown stressed none of those options were desirable and said each would reduce services the community currently receives.

Next steps: staff urged council to consider the phased hiring plan and noted a partial over-hire budget already proposed for police recruitment to reduce future gaps; staff will return with cost estimates and funding options for fall budget deliberations.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Colorado articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI