At the meeting, staff brought forward a purchase order request to repair a motor grader transmission. Staff provided usage details for the machine (remarks referenced roughly 24,438 hours of operation and that the engine had been rebuilt about two and a half years earlier) and read a repair cost estimate into the record.

A participant asked procedural questions and another moved "that we repair the motor grader" (motion language in the transcript). The transcript records supportive remarks — for example, commenters saying the repair should extend the grader’s service life by another 10 to 20 years — but it does not contain a roll‑call or tally of votes, nor an explicit statement that the motion passed.

Staff said they will prepare and distribute the check runs and a purchase order for the repair, and they asked reviewers to expect an email with the check run details. The transcript therefore documents a motion to repair and staff direction to proceed with administrative follow up, but it does not show a formal recorded approval vote in the excerpt provided.

Clarifying detail read into the record included statements that repairing the transmission should extend the machine’s useful life and that the engine had been rebuilt previously. The transcript lists a repair cost figure in the passage but the amount is fragmented in transcription and should be verified against the purchase order.

Because the meeting record in the transcript does not contain a vote tally or an explicit approval statement, any public reporting should note that a motion was made and staff was directed to follow up administratively, and should confirm approval status and final cost with staff or procurement records.