Burke County commissioners approved the first reading of an ordinance amending local speed-zone regulations after an extended discussion about school-zone camera enforcement and signage.

The measure, introduced as a first reading at the meeting of the Burke County Board of Commissioners, would amend posted school-zone speeds and clarify hours of reduced limits. Commissioner Kelly moved to accept the ordinance for first reading; Commissioner Nick seconded, and the motion passed on first reading.

The central issue during discussion was whether automated camera ticketing for a state highway section near a school — described in the meeting as a state highway where signs and a truck route (Bird Dog Way) are posted — has issued citations outside the times described in the county ordinance. Commissioners and legal counsel noted state statute sets certain signage and timing requirements and that the placement and initial contract for cameras occurred through the state Department of Transportation (GDOT) and the local school board, not the county. County counsel advised the board that tickets issued outside the ordinance’s parameters could be successfully challenged in court and recommended sending concerns to the contractor if discrepancies continue.

Commissioners debated specific hours in the draft: the ordinance text as read would make a school-zone 45 mph during school periods but only lower the limit to 45 mph from 7:30–8:30 a.m. and 2:30–3:30 p.m. on school days for the reduced-speed enforcement portion; signage at the site and the contractor's camera operation times were a source of confusion. One commissioner said signage currently indicates a broader 7:30 a.m.–3:30 p.m. window, while the ordinance language specifies two short windows tied to school arrival and dismissal.

Board members also discussed whether Bird Dog Way’s posted 45 mph should be changed to 55 mph to match the rest of the bypass; staff explained posted speeds by GDOT at turnover can be changed but would require this process. County counsel clarified the county’s role: the camera placement on the state road was approved by GDOT and the school board and was not put before the commission. Commissioners said they could adjust the ordinance between first and second reading and that second reading would be final.

Why it matters: the ordinance change affects how and when drivers can be cited in school zones, and several residents reported receiving camera tickets they believe fall outside the ordinance’s limits. The board’s action puts the county on record with a formal first reading and opens the item for revision before final adoption.

Looking ahead: commissioners said they will consider changes before second reading and recommended staff and the contractor ensure signage and camera operation match the ordinance’s language to reduce contested tickets.