Council adopts revitalization district resolution (25-51) after brief public hearing

5834860 · September 3, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City Council adopted Resolution 25-51 establishing a revitalization district designation pursuant to the Ohio Revised Code; the public hearing opened and closed with no public speakers and the resolution passed on a 10-0 roll call.

The Newark City Council adopted Resolution 25-51, establishing a revitalization district designation pursuant to Ohio Revised Code section 4301.81, after a brief public hearing with no public comments. Council member Koss moved to adopt the resolution, and Council member Houser seconded; the roll call recorded a unanimous vote in favor.

The public hearing was opened for Resolution 25-51 and the chair asked if anyone wished to speak for or against the measure; no speakers came forward and the hearing was closed before the council proceeded to a vote.

Why it matters: a revitalization district designation may enable specific local incentives or regulatory treatments under the cited state statute; the resolution was adopted by unanimous council vote at this meeting.

Vote and procedure: Council member Koss made the motion to adopt; Council member Houser seconded. Roll call recorded the following votes in favor: Labutas, Marney, Neely, Rapp, Rhine, Barker, Blume, Schuh, Koss and Hauser. The meeting transcript records the resolution as passed with a tally of 10 yes, 0 no.

The resolution text was read aloud twice as part of the statutory hearing and adoption process; the file shows no public comments were made on the record during the hearing.

Next steps and limits: the resolution creates the district designation as adopted by council; any subsequent actions (such as incentives, development agreements, or implementation measures) would require separate council proceedings or administrative steps and are not described in this meeting record.