The Development Review Committee reviewed a third resubmittal of the construction site plan for Onondage South, located south of Onondage and west of the Western Beltway. Jean presented the resubmittal and noted that multiple departments had reissued comments; some engineering responses were still pending.

Luke Class of 1828 Engineering told the committee the property owners are evaluating product types while remaining "locked in with the master plan," and said the 326‑unit count in the master plan remains in place. He told the committee, "We the property sellers are evaluating different product types, so we know we're locked in with the master plan. Got the 326 units, and it's the same product type mix, but they're evaluating potentially shipping some of the lots. Is it?"

Staff and consultants agreed there remain outstanding technical issues. On stormwater, staff said comments had been reissued and additional revisions were expected. On potable water demand, the record shows a numerical discrepancy staff flagged: a reviewer stated the requirement is 350 gallons per day but the submitted calculation used 300 gallons per day and "that's gonna have to be redone." The applicant and engineering consultant agreed to discuss the discrepancy offline and to provide revised calculations.

Nut graf: The resubmittal largely addressed prior comments but technical reviews remain open for stormwater and potable water demand; the applicant and 1828 Engineering will follow up with revised materials outside the meeting.

During the item, the meeting record also shows routine confirmations that Community Development and other departments had no further comments on the record. No motion or final approval was recorded at the DRC meeting.

Ending: Staff closed the item for the meeting and directed the applicant and consultant to resolve outstanding engineering comments and return with revised materials as needed.