Onondage South resubmittal reviewed; potable water demand and stormwater comments remain unresolved
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
At the Sept. 3 meeting the Development Review Committee heard the third submittal for Onondage South. Engineering representative said the property sellers are evaluating product types within a 326‑unit master plan; public works flagged a potable‑water demand discrepancy and stormwater comments remain outstanding.
The Development Review Committee on Sept. 3 reviewed a third submittal for the Onondage South construction site plan, south of Onondage and west of the Western Beltway.
"We the property sellers are evaluating different product types, so we know we're locked in with the master plan. Got the 326 units," said Luke Class of 1828 Engineering during the presentation.
Jean, the project manager for the submittal, told the committee planning staff and several departments had reissued comments on the resubmittal. Staff reported that 1828 Engineering had responded to many comments but that the city's engineering reviewer (identified by staff as "18 28 engineering") had not yet resolved all items.
A public works representative raised a potable‑water demand discrepancy on the record, saying the city requirement is 350 gallons per day while the submittal used 300 gallons per day and must be revised. The representative said the parties should "talk offline" to reconcile the demand estimate.
Stormwater comments were noted as outstanding and will require further conversation between the applicant and city stormwater staff. The transcript records no formal motion or recorded vote; staff directed follow up discussions outside the meeting to address water‑demand and stormwater comments.
The presentation indicated the project remains tied to a 326‑unit master plan; the transcript does not specify unit mix changes, phasing, funding sources or construction schedule.