Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Norfolk council upholds ARB denial of after-the-fact window replacements at Ghent home

August 27, 2025 | Norfolk, Norfolk County, Virginia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Norfolk council upholds ARB denial of after-the-fact window replacements at Ghent home
The Norfolk City Council on May 20 declined to grant a certificate of appropriateness for replacement windows at a single-family home at 709 West Princess Anne Road in the Ghent Historic and Cultural Conservation District, effectively upholding the Architectural Review Board’s (ARB) denial.
The appeal was presented by Ari Stein of the law firm Bishop Martingale on behalf of the homeowner, identified in the filing as Dr. Maroon. Stein said the owner bought the house in February 2024, discovered the windows were in poor condition, consulted three window companies and “instructed Pella to preserve as many of the existing windows as possible.” He said Pella concluded most windows could not be repaired and that replacement work cost about $90,000. Stein argued the ARB’s decision to deny the windows was “arbitrary and capricious.”
City staff told council they had mailed routine historic-district notices, including a mailing after the sale and annual mailings, and that a notice of violation was issued in March 2025 after the work was done. Staff also confirmed that a comparable property shown in the appeal packet (720 Morrie Avenue) is not in the historic district and therefore not subject to the same review.
During council discussion, members asked whether the expert who advised that the windows were unsalvageable was a structural engineer; Stein said the conclusion came from window professionals and a home inspector, and that the windows were “dissolving” and unsafe when removed. Council then considered an ordinance to grant the certificate of appropriateness. A majority voted against the motion. The motion to grant the COA failed, and the ARB denial remained in effect.
The record shows that the replacement work was performed without prior ARB approval and that the ARB denied all 34 replacement windows. The homeowner filed an after-the-fact certificate-of-appropriateness request after receiving a notice of violation. The council did not provide additional guidance in the meeting transcript on steps the homeowner must take to achieve compliance with the design guidelines.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Virginia articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI