Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City staff brief committee on Commerce email with guidance on ADUs after middle-housing ordinance took effect

September 02, 2025 | Port Orchard, Kitsap County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City staff brief committee on Commerce email with guidance on ADUs after middle-housing ordinance took effect
Port Orchard staff told the Land Use Committee they had routed the new middle-housing ordinance to the Washington State Department of Commerce and later received an email with additional guidance specific to accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Staff said the cityordinance, as adopted in June and effective July 1, complies with the legislation, and Commercefollow-up suggestions are advisory rather than mandatory.

Jim Pecan, principal planner, said he discussed the ADU guidance with Commerce and the city attorney and concluded the cityapproach for the R-1 zone is correct. He advised the committee that the Commerce email offered recommendations to make ADUs more affordable but framed those as suggestions rather than new legal requirements. Pecan said staff included that Commerce email in the committee packet for consideration.

Committee members focused discussion on two themes: preserving neighborhood character through design standards and the intended uses of ADUs. Mayor Papa Pecanci and Council member Eric Warden said they supported measures that keep ADUs from becoming unsightly "boxes" and argued ADUs should fit with existing architecture. Mayor Pecanci noted the city has about 300 ADUs being built and praised preapproved plans, which he said save an estimated $2,030,000 in upfront costs for builders.

Council member Eric Warden and other members stressed the difference between ADUs for family use and ADUs constructed primarily for rental-income purposes; several members said they would prefer incentives and design rules that favor ADUs that support generational living or household affordability over small rental units.

Staff did not recommend immediate code amendments, saying the existing code satisfies state law and that staff would bring forward amendments only if the committee asked for changes. Committee members indicated general support for retaining current design standards and continuing the preapproved-plan program while monitoring Commerce guidance.

No formal action was taken at the meeting; the committee directed staff to continue monitoring Commerce guidance and return with any recommended code amendments only if necessary.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI