Staff reports positive community feedback on accessory-dwelling-unit amendment; owner-occupancy requirement retained

5834417 · August 26, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff outlined proposed changes to accessory dwelling unit rules that set sizing and parking standards and keep owner-occupancy requirements for ADU applicants.

City planning staff provided an update on proposed text amendments governing accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The changes would refine sizing and best-practice standards and retain the requirement that the property owner reside on-site for an ADU to be permitted. Why it matters: ADU regulations affect housing supply and neighborhood character. Staff said ADUs are permitted in all residential zoning districts except multi-family apartment districts and that the proposed amendments aim to standardize size and parking requirements while preserving owner-occupancy to prevent absentee-investor conversions. Public outreach and staff recommendation: Staff said they distributed flyers and letters to civic leaders and presented to civic organizations and task forces; staff reported limited written feedback but said most comments were positive or neutral. The Planning Commission recommended the amendment by a 6–0 vote. If no further objections arise from outreach, staff requested an opportunity to place the amendment on a future council agenda for formal action. Ending: Staff will continue outreach and return the amendment to the council for public hearing if outreach yields no substantive objections.