Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Industry and former NASA leaders emphasize commercial LEO, microgravity research and infrastructure such as Gateway and space nuclear as engines of U.S. benefit

September 03, 2025 | Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Senate Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Industry and former NASA leaders emphasize commercial LEO, microgravity research and infrastructure such as Gateway and space nuclear as engines of U.S. benefit
Industry witnesses and former NASA leadership told the Senate Commerce Committee that a sustained U.S. presence in low Earth orbit (LEO) and a Gateway lunar platform are poised to deliver commercial and scientific returns—if Congress funds and Congress and NASA provide continuity. Michael Gold of Redwire described microgravity manufacturing and biofabrication experiments on the ISS that the company says have produced larger, more uniform drug crystals and 3‑D printed tissues, and he urged continued investment to ensure those benefits occur in the United States rather than abroad. "There is no question in my mind that microgravity manufacturing will transform the pharmaceutical and biotech fields," Gold said. Why it matters: witnesses tied LEO and Gateway capabilities to economic, diplomatic and scientific outcomes: - Microgravity uses on the ISS and future commercial stations were presented as enabling advanced pharmaceuticals and regenerative medicine (Gold and Jim Bridenstine discussed printing meniscus and cardiovascular tissue). - Redwire and other witnesses noted international partner investments in Gateway; Michael Gold said more than 60 percent of Gateway costs are being carried by international partners and that pulling back would risk losing those contributions. - Witnesses stressed the need for multiple commercial providers for low‑Earth‑orbit destinations to provide redundancy, competition and continued access when the ISS retires. - Panelists discussed infrastructure elements that would enable sustained lunar activity: nuclear surface power, Gateway's power and propulsion element, on‑orbit manufacturing and in‑space refueling. Jim Bridenstine cautioned the committee that the current lunar landing architecture depends on several untested operations and said NASA and Congress should scrutinize those risks. Discussion vs. action: testimony consisted of industry and former administration perspectives and recommendations; no contractual awards or program changes were announced at the hearing. Senators asked witnesses to provide additional technical detail and written follow‑up on workforce, launch capacity and university partnerships. Ending: Witnesses urged continued congressional support for NASA programs and for policies that enable private capital to participate with clear rules and multiple providers; they warned that funding uncertainty and program gaps could drive capability and commercial investment overseas.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee