Executive Director Ross Armstrong told the Nevada Commission on Ethics that the agency has made operational progress, citing quicker case processing, staffing steps to fill gaps and expanded outreach and training.

Armstrong said the commission’s oldest open investigations date from last June and that, after the meeting, only five investigations were open with seven cases pending resolution. To cover staff transitions, the commission plans to underfill an associate counsel position and to emergency‑appoint a part‑time law student to the senior legal researcher role over the summer. Armstrong said the underfill will allow Curtis (staff) to auto‑progress to the full position upon passage of the bar.

On collaboration, Armstrong described a recent interagency meeting with other government oversight offices to explore sharing audit information and avoiding duplication while respecting confidentiality laws. The executive director said the commission is monitoring bills in the Legislature that affect open‑meeting and public records laws; two constitutional‑amendment proposals that could have affected ethics law did not meet a recent deadline and are not currently moving forward.

The commission’s budget closed April 1 and included funding for a modernized case management system, outreach and training subscriptions, and reclassification of national association travel to the correct budget line. Armstrong also highlighted outreach efforts: an “ethics day” at the Legislature, a feature article in Nevada Lawyer on the history of the ethics law, and recent trainings including sessions for Nye County officials and the Clark County district attorney’s office.

“I will tell you that we are timely processing cases,” Armstrong said, adding that the agency’s new case‑log format will ease production of the annual report and provide commissioners an unredacted view for internal review. He told commissioners he will begin reporting recent review panel determinations in the executive director’s report so all commissioners can see jurisdictional and panel outcomes between full meetings.

Commissioners asked staff to clarify whether the commission can refer possible criminal activity discovered during investigations to law enforcement given confidentiality constraints; Armstrong said staff and commission counsel will confer and report back with options and any legislative changes needed to permit routine referrals in appropriate circumstances.