Tomball council approves three infrastructure assistance resolutions for retail, assisted living and business park projects

5829513 · September 2, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved three first-reading resolutions to assist infrastructure costs for private development: Una Holdings LLC (up to $174,061), Everwood Reserve Properties (up to $54,102) and Republic Business Park LP (up to $227,152). All passed 5-0 on first reading.

The Tomball City Council voted unanimously to approve three first‑reading TEDC resolutions offering infrastructure assistance to private development projects.

Tiffany (staff) presented Resolution No. 2025‑42, an agreement with Una Holdings LLC (doing business as Tomball Pond and Jewelry) to assist infrastructure costs for a retail center at 28159 Highway 249, in an amount not to exceed $174,061. The council approved the resolution on a 5-0 vote.

Tiffany then presented Resolution No. 2025‑43 for Everwood Reserve Properties, providing infrastructure assistance not to exceed $54,102 for construction of an assisted‑living facility at 13011 Medical Complex Drive; the council approved that resolution 5-0.

The council also approved Resolution No. 2025‑44, a project between the TEDC and Republic Business Park LP for infrastructure assistance for a multi‑building office/warehouse park at 920 South Persimmon Street, with an estimated expenditure not to exceed $227,152. That resolution passed 5-0.

Each resolution was presented on first reading at the meeting; staff described the projects and the proposed maximum assistance amounts. Council votes were unanimous on all three first‑reading resolutions.

The resolutions authorize the TEDC to enter assistance agreements but do not themselves specify construction schedules or funding disbursement timelines; staff did not provide those implementation details during the meeting.