Meeting participants voted to authorize attorney Bryce Duncan to represent them in a District Court appeal over a property easement dispute involving a neighbor identified as Hickel. Speaker 1, a resident, made the motion "I'll make a motion to have Bryce cover us in District Court of Logan County in Steenweer for Hickel," and the vote was recorded as in favor. Speaker 2, a resident, responded during the meeting with concerns about the encroachment, saying, "We cannot give our easements away." The dispute centers on a fence and stored vehicles that neighbors say extend into the town's streets-and-alleys easement and reduce visibility at a nearby stop sign. Participants said they obtained a survey that shows the fence and several vehicles encroach on public right-of-way. Speaker 2 said a container "it's part it's part it's within his fence," and described piled, inoperable vehicles that were placed near a lake and a block east of the complainants' properties. Participants described earlier legal activity: the group had previously dismissed an appeal after being told there were procedural errors in their filings, and they said they have since resubmitted the matter through their code officer, referred to in the meeting as "Henry, our code guy." Speaker 2 said the code officer "has found, again, nothing is in writing, and you are clear for the survey, you are clearly in the town's right easements of the streets and alleys." Meeting discussion included safety and property-boundary concerns: participants said the encroachment impedes visibility when stopping at an intersection and that survey GPS points placed the boundary under some of the parked vehicles. One resident said the presence of the vehicles came from elsewhere: "he carried all of these dead vehicles from his somewhere in Guthrie and has now piled up all of these dead vehicles on the lake." In addition to voting to retain Bryce Duncan, meeting participants discussed administrative steps to reduce legal expense: one participant said Lindy is completing paperwork "to reduce the cost of of his time." The meeting concluded shortly after the vote and a motion to adjourn. The action taken at the meeting is limited to authorizing legal representation for the appeal; participants described prior procedural errors in their filings, the existence of a recent survey, and ongoing code enforcement review but did not adopt ordinances, assessments, or other formal municipal actions during the session.