Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Clayton planners propose trimming UDO: eliminate 'open space,' restrict large animal operations and combine similar residential zones

September 03, 2025 | Town of Clayton, Hendricks County, Indiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Clayton planners propose trimming UDO: eliminate 'open space,' restrict large animal operations and combine similar residential zones
The Clayton Planning Commission reviewed a draft set of revisions to the town’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), focusing on district classifications and permitted uses. Commissioners said the changes aim to remove outdated or inapplicable rules and better tailor zoning to Clayton’s character.

Commissioners recommended eliminating the separate "open space" district because Lambert Park is the only property that currently meets that designation and the park property already functions under an institutional classification. "We have one property in town that meets the open space criteria, Lambert Park," a commissioner said, and the commission proposed treating the park as institutional use instead of retaining an open‑space district.

On agricultural uses, staff flagged that the current UDO language is broad enough to permit a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO). Commissioners said they do not want large livestock operations inside town limits and discussed explicitly listing permitted agricultural uses (for example, crop production, small‑scale farm sales) while excluding CAFOs. One commissioner described the local example of a large hog farm outside other towns and warned of the nuisance impacts of permitting similar operations in Clayton.

The commission also reviewed residential classifications and noted that R‑1 (single‑family residence district) and R‑4 (multifamily residence district) in the current text have nearly identical standards in setbacks, lot size and other dimensional requirements. Commissioners proposed consolidating or clarifying the two categories so the UDO is simpler and more locally appropriate.

Commissioners cautioned that any change to zoning classifications will require public hearings: the commission will recommend changes to the town council, both bodies will hold the required public hearings and the council must vote to adopt any amendments. Staff will continue drafting a revised UDO that omits the open‑space classification, narrows permissible agricultural uses, and proposes changes to residential zone definitions for commission review.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Indiana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI