This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Council members discussed at length a historic house on a very small lot that an absentee owner has proposed demolishing and whether the town should pursue an acquisition program to preserve historic fabric. Staff reported there are two active raze (demolition) orders in town (outside the historic district) and that the specific house in question is in the historic district; the owner inherited the property and has signaled a desire to remove the structure. Staff said they have supplied the owner with the demolition permit application and historic‑preservation guidelines and have not received a full justification that the structure cannot be saved. Council members noted the small lot size complicates future redevelopment because a replacement house would need variances and might not conform to lot‑size standards. Several members proposed creating a targeted acquisition program — using a redevelopment commission, tax sale mechanisms or voluntary purchase — to acquire and rehab historic houses and then resell or reuse them in ways that preserve the town’s historic character. Councilmembers emphasized voluntary transactions first; condemnation was discussed only as a theoretical option and not proposed. Members also raised the economic reality that very small historic homes often have highest economic use as short‑term rentals (Airbnb) because of size and lack of yards. Staff said the town does not currently have an ordinance regulating short‑term rentals; a recent state law has limited local regulatory authority over short‑term rentals and the town has largely stayed out of that space. The council was told innkeeper’s tax revenue for short‑term rentals is administered at the county level and the town does not receive a direct share unless it applies for tourism funds or other distributions. There were no motions or votes; council asked staff to pursue voluntary outreach to the property owner to see if he would sell and to compile options — legal, funding and programmatic — for a potential town acquisition program for council review.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,054 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit