Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Jefferson County updates tax‑increment agreement for Lutheran Legacy Campus, removes incorrect inclusionary‑housing recital

August 26, 2025 | Jefferson County, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Jefferson County updates tax‑increment agreement for Lutheran Legacy Campus, removes incorrect inclusionary‑housing recital
Jefferson County commissioners on Aug. 26 approved replacing an earlier resolution tied to a tax‑increment revenue agreement with the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority for the Lutheran Legacy Campus Urban Renewal Plan, removing an inaccurate recital about a contemplated City of Wheat Ridge inclusionary housing ordinance.

Chris O’Keefe, Jefferson County planning and zoning director, told the board that Resolution CC25‑200 included a recital stating that the city had sent correspondence indicating it intended to adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance (IHO) that would require 10% of new residential units to be affordable. O’Keefe said specific letter correspondence from Wheat Ridge was not received and that the agreement’s negotiated terms already ensured that affordable housing could be built without relying on an IHO. For that reason, staff recommended revoking Resolution CC25‑200 and adopting a replacement that deletes the inaccurate recital.

Commissioners moved to approve the updated terms for the tax‑increment financing agreement; the motion passed with recorded aye votes from Commissioner Kerr, Commissioner Zenzinger and Commissioner Dahlkemper.

Why it matters: Removing the recital clarifies the county’s contractual assurances about affordable housing provisions for the Lutheran Legacy Campus and avoids relying on a municipal ordinance that had not been confirmed in correspondence. County staff framed the change as corrective language rather than a shift in substantive commitments to construct affordable units under the agreement.

Details: The transcript records that the city was “contemplating an IHO” and that the draft terms were negotiated “to provide the county the assurance that affordable housing as defined in the agreement may be constructed without the need for the IHO.” Staff noted no specific city letter confirming an IHO was received. The board’s vote to approve the revised terms was recorded as unanimous in the meeting transcript.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Colorado articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI