Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise flooding and unfinished‑park concerns; city says playground design still in progress
Summary
Residents told council that Midtown Park and surrounding neighborhoods face repeated flooding and that several park projects remain incomplete; city staff said playground design is ongoing and a different park manufacturer may provide a larger play area.
Multiple residents told the City of Bryan council they are experiencing recurring flooding in the Midtown Park area and questioned the necessity and scope of proposed spillway and dam reconstruction; residents also raised frustrations about unfinished park projects including Aston Park and a playground donation project.
Patrick Giamalva, a resident who spoke during public comment on agenda and non‑agenda items, described repeated flooding near Midtown Park and said the park’s spillway and dam “held very good” during Hurricane Harvey but that recent development and impervious surfaces are increasing run‑off. He objected to what he described as a $4.04–$5.6 million expenditure proposed for the spillway and dam, saying the work is “completely unnecessary.” Giamalva also urged the council to prioritize opening and restoring Aston Park and to consider a bridge connection and boardwalk improvements at DuBain Park.
Giamalva asked whether culverts and inflow structures have been fully evaluated and requested the city review how proposed reconstruction would interact with existing drainage. He also requested public records related to the finances and infrastructure costs for past projects including Phillips Golf Course, the Phillips Event Center and the city’s Big Shots/Topgolf site; those records were requested formally on the public record.
In reply, City staff (Parks/city manager) said the playground donation project remains in the design phase and that city staff had paused the original plan while identifying a different park manufacturer and builder; staff said the new supplier is expected to provide “probably at least twice as much” play equipment as the previous plan, but added that procurement and construction “takes time.” No firm construction start date was provided at the meeting.
Several residents also voiced concern that Aston Park has been used as a construction staging/dump site in recent years and urged the city to reopen and develop the park. The council did not vote on park funding or immediate construction tasks at the meeting; staff indicated continued design and procurement work but did not provide a timeline for completion.
Councilmembers did not adopt any formal direction to staff to accelerate specific park constructions during the meeting; residents were advised to submit public records requests for the financial details they requested.
