Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Credit Rating topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Moody’s rating and district finances: Elkhorn maintains Aa2 rating; business office summarizes fund balance and cash-flow timing
Summary
Moody’s maintained its Aa2 rating for the Elkhorn Area School District, and the district’s business manager reviewed cash-flow timing, long-term debt (~$30 million) and a reported fund-balance ratio around 29–30 percent, noting the cash-inflow timing of property tax and state aid affects day-to-day cash.
Get email alerts on the Finance Credit Rating topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Elkhorn Area School Board received a concise Moody’s report at the Feb. 24 meeting showing the district’s long-term rating maintained at double-A2 (Aa2), district business officials said.
A district presentation to the board summarized key fiscal indicators: Moody’s comparison of multi-year financial ratios, a fund-balance percentage reported in the high 20s to about 30 percent, and a long-term debt total the presenter identified as roughly $30 million. The business office explained that fund-balance percentages are a balance-sheet calculation and do not equal cash-on-hand because taxes and some state aids are recorded as receivables until actual collections are received; tax and state-aid timing drives intra-year cash-flow fluctuations.
The presenter told the board the district’s available cash is lower than fund-balance percentages suggest because of the timing of tax receipts and state aids, and that many districts in the state have different revenue-limit histories that affect per-pupil funding comparisons. The board discussed typical reserve levels and the presenters said a fund-balance around 18–20% generally gives districts cash flexibility to avoid short-term borrowing for payroll; the district’s fund-balance percentage was described as steady compared with peers.
Board members asked what would be required to move to a higher rating band; the presenter said property-value growth, further stability and materially larger property-tax base or large new taxpayers would be the principal drivers. The Moody’s report was presented as informational and no board action was taken.

