Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance Credit Rating topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Moody’s rating and district finances: Elkhorn maintains Aa2 rating; business office summarizes fund balance and cash-flow timing

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Moody’s maintained its Aa2 rating for the Elkhorn Area School District, and the district’s business manager reviewed cash-flow timing, long-term debt (~$30 million) and a reported fund-balance ratio around 29–30 percent, noting the cash-inflow timing of property tax and state aid affects day-to-day cash.

The Elkhorn Area School Board received a concise Moody’s report at the Feb. 24 meeting showing the district’s long-term rating maintained at double-A2 (Aa2), district business officials said.

A district presentation to the board summarized key fiscal indicators: Moody’s comparison of multi-year financial ratios, a fund-balance percentage reported in the high 20s to about 30 percent, and a long-term debt total the presenter identified as roughly $30 million. The business office explained that fund-balance percentages are a balance-sheet calculation and do not equal cash-on-hand because taxes and some state aids are recorded as receivables until actual collections are received; tax and state-aid timing drives intra-year cash-flow fluctuations.

The presenter told the board the district’s available cash is lower than fund-balance percentages suggest because of the timing of tax receipts and state aids, and that many districts in the state have different revenue-limit histories that affect per-pupil funding comparisons. The board discussed typical reserve levels and the presenters said a fund-balance around 18–20% generally gives districts cash flexibility to avoid short-term borrowing for payroll; the district’s fund-balance percentage was described as steady compared with peers.

Board members asked what would be required to move to a higher rating band; the presenter said property-value growth, further stability and materially larger property-tax base or large new taxpayers would be the principal drivers. The Moody’s report was presented as informational and no board action was taken.