Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City proposes new in-house attorney, project manager and operational positions; committee told hires could reduce contractor costs

5814570 · March 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff requested several new positions — a city attorney, project manager, victim advocate/evidence technician, wastewater maintenance and a facilities lead — and described offsetting reductions in consultant and contract spending where applicable.

City staff presented a package of proposed personnel changes and additions meant to reduce contract costs and support growing operational demands.

Key proposed hires included a full‑time in‑house city attorney (projected fully loaded cost roughly $225,000) which staff said would significantly reduce current outside‑legal spending (staff currently spend roughly $150,000–$200,000 annually on legal services). The city also proposed a full‑time project manager (estimated $170,000 fully loaded) to manage the growing volume of capital projects and to replace ad‑hoc contracted program management.

Public‑safety and public‑works related positions included a combined victim‑advocate/evidence technician for police (estimated net general-fund impact about $23,000 after reallocating an existing vacancy), a wastewater maintenance position, and a facilities lead to coordinate building upkeep across city assets. Staff also proposed a part‑time custodial position to replace a long‑standing contract service; staff noted this move could slightly reduce materials and services costs but would add payroll and benefits in the general fund.

Staff flagged a six‑month, half‑year accounting position to handle increased accounts-payable volume but said that hire depends on schedule for moving into the new business center and is therefore proposed only as a half‑year addition. The budget committee asked staff to provide further detail and prioritization for these requests; no hiring decisions were made at the meeting.