Police retroactive pay figures tabled pending treasurer verification

5811147 · September 3, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to approve retroactive pay for two reclassified, non‑sworn positions in the police department was tabled after disagreement about the precise dollar amounts; the board asked the police chief and treasurer to reconcile figures before the next meeting.

The Board of Aldermen tabled a motion to approve retroactive pay for two reclassified, non‑sworn positions in the police department after members asked that the police chief and the treasurer reconcile differing calculations. Background: The Public Safety and Human Resources committees reviewed pay adjustments for two positions — a staff operations specialist (formerly a staff sergeant) and an executive assistant to the police chief — and discussed retroactive pay dating to July 1, 2024. Committee notes listed estimated retro payments, and the treasurer’s office sent a follow-up email recomputing amounts earlier the same day. Why it matters: The amounts would be charged to FY25 payroll and have fringe-cost implications. The treasurer told the committee that because the retroactive pay relates to the FY25 payroll period, it must be recorded in FY25 financials; auditors would require that treatment. Board action: After committee discussion and a request from the police chief for additional time to reconcile calculations with the treasurer’s office, a member moved to table the motion until the chief and treasurer agree on the final amounts. The motion to table passed by voice vote. What’s next: The police chief and treasurer will re‑compute the retroactive pay and agreed fringe costs, then present an agreed figure at the next meeting for board action.