Commissioners discussed publishing the commission‑court binders that accompany meeting agendas to the county website to increase transparency. "There are counties that put them out online for you to view," the County Judge said, noting the intention to post agendas, minutes, binders and video together. Several members and staff said full publication would improve transparency but flagged the need to remove or redact sensitive items before posting.

Staff said binders frequently include confidential or sensitive details and undertaking redactions is time consuming. The court agreed the county attorney should review and redact items that are not publicly releasable and that redacted binders could be posted with the agenda when practicable. In the meantime, staff said the county will continue to respond to public‑information requests under state law and will provide materials on request; the presenter said materials should be made available "in a reasonable, prompt sense," even if full binder posting requires additional review.

The court also discussed a practical change to agenda formatting: listing the name of the official or department presenter beside each agenda item and including a standard executive‑session line citing applicable code sections so the court can move into closed session when authorized. The court asked staff to examine procedures and to consult the county attorney about redaction scope and timing before expanded online publication.

Status and next steps: the court directed staff to engage the county attorney for redaction review and to publish binders when feasible; for now, requesters may obtain materials by contacting county offices under the normal public‑information process.