Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Lafayette board denies appeal to return pit bull seized after fatal dog attack

September 11, 2025 | Lafayette City, Tippecanoe County, Indiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Lafayette board denies appeal to return pit bull seized after fatal dog attack
The Lafayette Board of Works on Sept. 9 denied an appeal by Mohammed and Danica Payne to return a pit bull, Chevelle (also called Chevy), that was seized Aug. 28 after an attack that left a small dog euthanized.
The board heard testimony from animal-control officers and reviewed veterinary records. Jackie Cost, city attorney, presided over the appeal hearing.
The board’s animal-control officer, Mitchell Birchfield, said the victim dog, identified in records as Django, suffered “multiple punctures, bruises, and possible fracture on the pelvis and spine,” and that the dog was later euthanized at Purdue Small Animal Clinic because of a poor prognosis. Birchfield said the initial 911 report indicated the incident occurred Aug. 27 and that the victim owners were reluctant to come forward.
Birchfield said Chevelle was unrestrained in the front yard when the animals met and that after the encounter the owner and another person had to pry the dogs apart. “Anytime that there is a dog that is, killed by another dog, it's deemed a dangerous activity, and we would like to quarantine first off and then just to protect the public,” Birchfield testified.
Mohammed, who identified himself as a resident of 2117 Arapahoe Drive, acknowledged Chevelle was not leashed that day and described the dog as normally obedient. He asked the board for leniency and said, “Give me a chance to get it right,” adding that he would comply with leash and restraint rules going forward.
After discussion the board moved to deny the appeal. The motion was seconded and the board voted in favor; no opposing votes were recorded on the record. City staff told Mohammed and Payne after the hearing that animal-control staff would meet with them to explain next steps.
The decision was an administrative ruling on the appeal; the board’s stated basis was the severity of the victim dog’s injuries and the city’s animal-control standards.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Indiana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI