This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Several residents used the public-comment period at the Sept. 2 Pasadena City Council meeting to raise sharp criticisms of the city's convention center project and to allege misconduct in local police investigations and personnel decisions.
Citizen Steven Alvarez said he opposed use of tax dollars for the convention center and accused council members and officials of "backdoor dealings" connected to reinstatement of a police supervisor. Alvarez told the council: "You voted to raise our taxes...When we find out backdoor dealings'...my children are doing without." He asked whether a meeting occurred between city officials and police-union representatives before the mayoral election and requested further transparency. Alvarez spoke again during a public hearing portion of the meeting and said he would "look into the backdoor deals" and urged use of Freedom of Information Act requests to follow campaign funding.
Citizen Eric Sanchez addressed the council with a series of allegations about law-enforcement handling of two deaths and asserted people had made "false allegations" about him. Sanchez asked the council to provide an explanation about a photograph displayed at City Hall and said, consistently, that he believed investigative details had not been disclosed publicly. His remarks included claims that certain officers had been connected to misconduct; Sanchez presented those as allegations and asked for investigation.
Council members acknowledged the concerns during the budget discussion and several said they required additional documentation about the convention center before a final vote. The mayor and other members reiterated that further workshops and information would be provided. No formal council action on police employment or on reopening criminal investigations was taken during the meeting.
This article reports allegations made during public comment; these claims have not been substantiated in the meeting record and were presented by the speakers as their assertions.
Speaker-attributed statements are taken from the public-comment portion of the Sept. 2 council meeting.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,048 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit